NDLR Resourceful Coffee Morning 2011

NDLR Resourceful Coffee Morning 2011, a set on Flickr.

On Tuesday 6th December, in collaboration with the NDLR, we hosted a Resourceful Coffee Morning in CELT.

The purpose of the event was to

• Find out more about Open Educational Resources for Higher Education
• Browse through digital resources relevant to your teaching
• See how other academics are using digital resources in their teaching practice
• Learn about collaborative projects and communities of practice

Catherine Bruen, manager of the NDLR service, came from Dublin to demonstrate the potential of the service.

Here are some photos from the event.

Threshold standards for Blackboard courses: Innovation Prevention?

Image: Simon Howden / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

At the Durham Blackboard users' conference last month, there was a panel discussion on threshold standards for VLE courses: whether we should have them; at what level; and what they should include. Others have written about the discussion including Julian Beckton's excellent blog post and Matt Cornock's summary.

Here are my thoughts on the issue of threshold standards  for Blackboard courses at NUIG.

Since Blackboard went mainstream in 2007, we have never required that academic staff use Blackboard to support their teaching. We make it easy for them to use, authentication is via ldap so no new userids or passwords have to be remembered, the courses are created and ready for use, the students are automatically enrolled in the correct courses, we provide training and support. Uptake has been massive, with very few staff not using Blackboard and, I estimate, very few students who don't have resources (at some level) available to them on Blackboard. So why would we need threshold (minimum) standards?

For a start, we couldn't enforce such requirements. Every single module code on our records, whether active, defunct or redundant, has a corresponding Course created on Blackboard. So, we have a huge number of Bb courses, many of which are empty. Moreover, we have no central system that records who is responsible for what module code. So instructor associations with Bb courses is still largely a manual process. Who would be responsible for a non-conforming or empty Blackboard course?

Blackboard is used to support teaching in different ways at NUIG. For distance and blended learning, Blackboard is central to teaching and learning activities. For primarily face-to-face teaching, Blackboard might just be used to provide administrative information, with readings and lecture notes. There is a whole spectrum of potential use between these two points. The important thing is to focus on the teaching and learning and to use Blackboard ( or other appropriate tools) to support these activities.

I can understand the point about consistency for students, so that there is a standard way for students to access materials. It is true that some Blackboard courses are very disorganised, with documents thrown into folders, using a mix of formats and no logical thinking behind any of it. I would suggest though, that what is needed is good signposting, and some thinking and planning on the part of the instructor on the course. After all, we don't dictate minimal standards for other teaching tools: minimal requirements for PowerPoint slides; the threshold form of a 1 hour lecture; standard teaching methods. But we do expect that these elements are organised and planned.

What of innovative, creative and effective course designs that don't fit into the standard template? Do we run the risk of having people subvert the requirements, making organisation more confusing for students, or driving the innovators out of the VLE altogether? Are threshold standards for the VLE an invention of the Innovation Prevention Department (IPD)?

At the School or Programme level, it may well be worth considering a standard, but flexible, Bb course structure. This is particularly true where distance or blended learners are involved.

Course information, learning outcomes, reading lists, staff details, handbooks, timetables, assessment information, are all examples of information that should be available to students. The VLE is an excellent place for them, but there may be other, more suitable distribution methods. The requirement is that they are provided somehow, not that they are all contained in Blackboard.

Returning to the image of the VLE as a Trojan horse; at NUIG Blackboard is an easy first step into using technologies to support teaching. I believe that by imposing minimal required standards on Blackboard courses we would be creating an impediment, giving lecturers a reason to reject the VLE completely.

There are other things we can do to encourage better use of Blackboard. For example, each course is created with a standard menu, including menu items for Course Information, Learning Outcomes, Feedback. This is a reminder that these elements are expected, though many staff just ignore them. We can also put together guidelines and recommendations for effective Blackboard courses, in a non-threatening, non-judgemental way. See, for example, Leeds University's 10 Tips for improving a Blackboard course.

So, in CELT, let's continue in our role as guides, supporting academics in their use of Blackboard, and avoid becoming the VLE wing of the IPD.

Tweet

Getting started with Turnitin

Last Friday I gave a workshop on Using Turnitin to Deter Plagiarism for academic staff at St Angela's College, Sligo. St Angela's is a college of NUI Galway and occupies a beautiful site on the shore of Lake Gill, just outside Sligo, and it is always a pleasure to visit there.

The workshop was aimed at teaching staff getting started with using Turnitin. As we went through the practicalities of setting up a Turnitin assignment in their VLE (moodle) and discussed strategies and options, I stressed a few points. These are the take-home messages that I think are key when starting to use Turnitin.

1. Focus on the teaching: the 12 people in the group were concerned teachers. The last thing they want or need to become is "plagiarism police", with a focus on plagiarism detection. Turnitin is best used as a teaching tool, so make sure that the strategy you use, and every option you choose, is based on improving the learning for your students. 

2. Turnitin does not detect plagiarism, it highlights matching text. It is very good at what it does, but it cannot tell you that a student has plagiarised. You, as the teacher, are the one who decides if the matching text indicates a problem, or otherwise.

3. Turnitin can only be used to help detect plagiarism of text, or cut-and-paste copying. It doesn't identify plagiarism of ideas, and won't be of any use with ghost-written materials.

4. Originality reports have to be interpreted. You have to examine a report to understand what the coloured highlighting is telling you. There are many reasons why text might be highlighted: direct quotes, bibliographic references or just writing on a particular topic using the correct language for the discipline. Highlighted text could be an indication that the student has actually performed a good literature survey!

5. The similarity index should never be used as a measure of plagiarism. Do I really need to explain this?

6. You have to follow up, when you find a problem. This could be in the form of general feedback to a class group, where there are common issues across the class; or individual feedback to address a particular piece of writing. Where a serious problem exists, it will be necessary to use formal procedures. Feedback should come first though, see point (1).

7. Giving students access to originality reports can be a great learning tool, when they are learning academic writing. But it has to be in a supported environment, where they can understand how to interpret what they are seeing. See point (4).

For more on strategies for using Turnitin, see my presentation from the E-Assessment Scotland conference in Dundee last August.

Do you have any take-home messages for teachers starting off with Turnitin in the classroom? Please add to the list by writing a comment. Feedback on my list is also welcome.

Tweet

Testing: Kaltura for Blackboard

I'm currently engaged in testing out Kaltura, a platform for video, as part of a 3 year extended pilot at NUI Galway. It has a rather nice integration with Blackboard, which we're hoping to launch within the next few weeks. If any members of staff are using or creating their own video and are interested in being part of an initial pilot study in the next few months, please get in contact with me.

For the moment, I'm testing the embed feature. So, here's a short video recorded during our guerilla video workshop with the participants in the PG Cert in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.

Using the VLE as a Trojan Horse

The Calman Learning Centre

Last week I travelled to Durham for the 2012 Blackboard Users' Conference. Coming immediately at the end of the Christmas/New Year break, it was a shock to the system, and a rude kick start to my brain. But I survived, and came away with my head buzzing. Now, if I can just get time to implement some of those ideas...

The two keynotes, in particular, got me thinking about training and support for our academic staff in their use of technologies for teaching and learning.  The learning technology team at CELT aims to provide pedagogical support for staff in their use of technology, although often we end up dealing with queries about user accounts and basic support for our VLE, Blackboard. Our mantra is that we want to encourage each member of staff, from their current technology use, to do something a little more. We always keep in mind that the teaching/learning is key, and we're just using the technology to (better) support it.

With this in mind, Gráinne Conole's (@gconole) metaphor of the VLE as theTrojan Horse makes perfect sense to me. Since we went mainstream with Blackboard almost 5 years ago, the uptake by staff members has been very positive. Encouraged by automatic enrolment of students in the correct courses, the possibility of easy communication (announcements, email) and demand from students themselves,  academics at NUI Galway have embraced the VLE, albeit (in some cases) with reluctance and/or trepidation.

We have a significant number of early-adopters, champions and people willing to experiment, and these people really keep us on our toes. But we also have a large group of staff who just use Blackboard as a repository, making minimal use of its functionality. Our challenge now is to use this as a basis to encourage them along and to try something new. Gráinne described the VLE as the "nursery slope" for academics: a safe and supported environment where they can learn the basics of technology for learning. But, how to do this when the average academic is already overworked and doesn't have time to even turn up for basic training?

The other image that I liked in Gráinne's keynote was the notion of the VLE+. It's no longer a case of the PLE vs VLE: we can extend our VLE with a myriad of extra functionality to support teaching and learning activities. This afternoon I met with our learning technologies team, to plan our activities for the next few months, and we discussed all of our Blackboard connectors which make up our VLE+. At the moment, the list includes: Campus Pack (Learning Objects); Turnitin; Echo360; QuestionMark; Kaltura. This all provides a seamless environment for staff and students - to the extent that all our support tickets say "Problem with Blackboard", when it's probably not a Blackboard issue at all.

Is this a bad thing? As raised by Nick Pearce (@drnickpearce) in his presentation Beyond Good and Evil, is "closed" necessarily evil?

Ray Land (now Professor of Higher Education at Durham University and Director of Durham’s Centre for Learning Teaching and Research in Higher Education), in his keynote addressed exactly this point. Higher Education is historically closed - with teaching taking place behind closed doors. The newer, digital world, challenges this; it challenges the authority of the academic and breaks down barriers. While there are some that embrace the digital world, for many academics, this represents "troublesome knowledge", and requires a change of culture. The digital world is constantly changing and evolving. For learning technologies, this means a new tool every day (at least) that could be used in teaching and learning. It's difficult, even for those of us who work in the area, to keep track of developments. The VLE is a way to contain that volatility, and slow things down.

Footbridge, Durham

In the same way that teachers will always have a role in leading students through a new landscape (while not necessarily being the source of all knowledge), our learning technologies team will have a role to play in leading academics through the fast paced, digital world, using the VLE+ as the safe and supported environment.

Up next, when I get a chance, some thoughts on the panel session around threshold, minimum standards for VLE courses.

Welcome to the class of 2011

This afternoon I am meeting the new group of students on the Learning Technologies module, part of the PG Diploma in Academic Practice.

It looks like we have a great group of people and I look forward to working with them over the next couple of months, as they explore the use of technology in their teaching.

E-Assessment Scotland 2011 - my prezi

I was really pleased to be invited to give a presentation at the annual E-Assessment Scotland conference in Dundee last week. The conference itself is a free event, and attracted around 300 delegates, mostly from the UK. I'll write a blog post soon (when Blackboard is fixed) about the conference.

In the meantime, here's my presentation, which I prepared using Prezi. It was my first Prezi, and I learned a lot in putting it together - but that's another blog post.

Supporting Students' Writing Skills using Turnitin on Prezi

Tweet

Blackboard 9.1 is coming

The upgrade of our Blackboard system to release 9.1 is progressing according to schedule. In the last few weeks, we’re received many enquiries about when the new system will be available and what changes staff can expect.

When will I have access to my courses?
It is intended that the new Blackboard system will be available for use during the week of 22nd August.

There will be a new URL to access the upgraded system, but otherwise you will log on using your username and password as before.

You will have access to all your courses for the academic year 2011-12. So, if you are an instructor on a Blackboard course currently, or if you requested access to a course within the last few weeks, you will have access to that new course on the new system.

In keeping with existing policy, the new courses will be created as empty shells, ready for you to develop as you wish.

What about the teaching materials in my current course? How can I get it into my new course?
To facilitate the re-use of teaching materials, the new Blackboard system will also have courses for the academic year 2010-11, to which you will have access. These are not full courses, and will not include student enrolments, so cannot be used for teaching purposes. However, much of your content from the current Blackboard system is being migrated into this area, so that you can import it, or copy components of it, into your new Blackboard course for 2011-12.


Can I still access the old site?
The old Blackboard site will continue to be available until October 2011. This is to facilitate any courses that are active over the summer period, and to facilitate access to 2010-2011 materials and student work.

What benefits are there to the upgrade?
There are many benefits that you will experience with the new Blackboard, many of which will become clear as you use the system. Just some immediate advantages are:

Improved Interface

• There is a new drag-and-drop interface making it easier to navigate the system and complete tasks with less clicks.
• The OK confirmation button (which displayed when creating content in Blackboard 8) has been removed.
• The course control panel is located on the main page of the course for easier editing.
• A new “edit mode” makes editing your course easier and gives you a (95%) student view of your course.

Course Statistics

• The course statistics function will be fully operational.

Improved Group features

• The new group features allow instructors to create any number of groups at once.
• Students can be randomly assigned to groups, manually assigned to groups, or asked to sign-up for groups themselves.

User Information Sessions: What’s New in Blackboard 9.1?
In preparation for the new release, CELT is facilitating User Information Sessions. During the session we’ll go through the main changes in BB 9.1 (working on the test server) and we’ll provide you with your own sandpit Blackboard test module which you’ll be able to access during and beyond the drop-in session.

A list of upcoming CELT events, including these Information Sessions, can be found on our CELT events site.

CELT will announce a full programme of training sessions. These will be a combination of short “What’s new in 9.1” for experienced Blackboard users as well as a new version of our popular “Introduction to Blackboard” workshops for new users.

We will also arrange a number of drop-in sessions to coincide with the start of teaching, for hands-on support and advice.

We are currently working on some on-line resources and will update our own Blackboard Support site in time for the new system.

Ken Robinson keynote at BbWorld 2011

In CELT, we are busy preparing for the introduction of Blackboard 9.1 in NUI Galway. More information about the new system will become available over the next couple of weeks and you can expect a full schedule of information sessions and training opportunities.

In the meantime, here is a recording of a keynote given by Sir Ken Robinson at Blackboard World 2011 two weeks ago.



Tweet

The #nairtl11 backchannel

Last week we hosted the joint Galway Symposium/NAIRTL conference at NUIG, with the title Engaging Minds: Active learning, participation and collaboration in Higher education. Iain has already blogged about the event and the recordings of the keynotes will be available in the near future.

As part of the local organisation, and having participated in a number of very active conference backchannels in the last year (for example #pelc11), we wanted to ensure an active twitter experience. This was particularly important because one of our keynotes, Derek Bruff from Vanderbilt University, has already written about Encouraging a Conference Backchannel on Twitter.

The strategy we used was based on Derek’s guide. Here’s what we did:

Hashtag: obviously, nothing can happen without a hashtag. It has to be short and easily remembered. With a joint conference, this can be tricky! So, I just proposed using #nairtl11, which was accepted, and it worked a treat! We started using this a couple of weeks before the conference, to build up awareness. We also made sure it was included on the conference programme, so nobody could be in doubt.

Twitter Team: About a week before the conference, I assembled my twitter team. This included a number of people who I know are active on twitter and have participated in backchannels before. Their role was to “keep the backchannel going” and to encourage others to join in. Recruits were @catherinecronin, @marloft, @kellycoate, @thecosmicfrog. We also let @iainmacl join in, though it took him a few attempts to get the hashtag right! A couple of days before the event, I pointed them to Derek’s Instructions to the Twitter Team

Twitter Display: During down time at the conference, before keynotes and at breaks, we displayed the twitter stream in the main venue and in the breakout rooms. We used Visible Tweets, and the rotation animation style, which I’d seen used at #pecl11 to great effect. This display had a number of positive effects:

• It alerted participants to the existence of the backchannel and encouraged them to take part;
• It illustrated the participation of people who were not at the conference at all, but were engaging with our reports;
• It ensured that those tweeting were being polite, knowing that what they said could be projected in big letters on screen.

The backchannel conversation was very effective, with over 800 tweets generated, mostly over the two days of the conference. As well as tweeting what was happening and key points being made, there was a rich conversation going on as well. We got a good following from outside the conference location, including colleagues in DIT who couldn’t attend because of exam board meetings (@muireannok, @m_crehan) as well as contributions from tweeters outside Ireland, including the UK, USA, Canada and New Zealand.

I used the Archivist to analyse the #nairtl11 tweets. It gives some pretty graphs to show, for example, tweet volume over time and top tweeters.

Tweet

Echo360 Community Conference Europe

The Echo360 Community Conference Europe event, entitled Education Unconfined, took place last Wednesday at the London School of Economics. I went along, with Labhaoise Ni Dhonnchadha, to find out about the new release (version 4.0) and to network with other users.

We have been piloting Echo360 for lecture capture at NUI Galway for the last couple of years, with 5 installations in lecture theatres and seminar rooms.

We were very impressed with the venue, the New Academic Building (NAB) at the LSE. It is bright and airy, with lots of space. The view from the 8th floor was stunning.

The event itself was successful, with lots of exciting new features in version 4.0. We especially like the contextual collaboration for students, along with usage trend reports for instructors. The delegated admin capability is also very important for us, as we contemplate scaling up.

There was an excellent session from Jeremy Speller and Andrea Sella from University College London, where there are 20 lecture theatres equipped with Echo360. I liked Andrea's image of lecture capture as a time machine - offering the possibility for students to go back and revisit those parts of a lecture that were unclear. He made it particularly clear that students do not see recordings as a replacement for a lecture. His talk finished up with some interesting questions on how/where lecture capture can make an impact: performance, attendance or experience? And how can we measure this effect?

Inspired by Doug Belshaw and his use of Storify to document conference attendance, I've put together a small story myself, using my tweets from the conference and a couple of photos I took.

EdTech2011 Early Bird Registration iPod Touch Draw on Monday 23 May

This year's EdTech conference Innovation, Technologies and Practice: Show me the Learning! is being held from 1-2 June 2011 Waterford Institute of Technology.

As usual, there is a wonderful representation from NUIG covering the following innovative areas:

• Bonnie Long 'Implemention of Digital Storytelling with Pre-Service Teachers - Challenges and Lessons Learned'
  
  
• Anne Egan 'Podcasting as a Novice an a Legal Environment'
  
  
• Catherine Cronin 'Re-thinking the Lecture - Audio Podcasts and Telling Stories'
  
  
• Paul Gormley and Anne Walsh 'The Quick Win Meets the Trojan Horse: Formative 2.0 Assessments and the Adult Blended Learners Experience'
  
  
• A number of CELT staff are also involved in the EdTech Organising Committee, which gives us an inspiring overview of the learning technolgy landscape in Ireland.

For those presenters or potential delegates, registration is now open. For a chance to win an iPod touch please register before lunchtime on Monday 23rd May


You can register for the conference and you preferred free workshops via the EdTech2011 online registration system.

The draw will take place on Monday afternoon!

Best of luck!